Friday, July 29, 2005

Welcome to Sunny California

I have been living in California now since the middle of June. My car and bike just don't look right with those awful white California plates. Marked, branded, the same as those people that moved to and ruined Idaho. I take solace only in the fact that I can now drive any way I like and the people in the other cars will be cursing those danged californians! Not me, though. I am an Idahoan.

Ridgecrest is nice. It's certainly not beachfront property, actually being in the middle of the Mojave desert, but, as the recruiters like to say, "We're not in the middle of nowhere, we're two and a half hours from everything!" I never would have just decided to move here, but I like my new job--about which I will not be blogging since it seems to be bad for one's employability--and it's a nice place. I am in continual search for others of my own kind: youngish single people for whom conversations about potty training and poop are out-of-bounds. In Ridgecrest we are a rare breed. This means that those of us who have put off marriage are now faced with a shrinking gene pool in which to swim.

For years now I have refused to give in to online dating. Of course, in a world where porn and gambling have invaded the internet, it's hard to imagine another pernicious evil, dating, not making it's place too. So, with much trepidation, and not a little encouragement from my unnamed support team, I joined eHarmony.com and LDSSingles.com. So to all of the others in Relationships Anonymous:

Hello, my name is Ricky, and I have a dating problem. I have been single all my life, and my mother thinks I have a problem with committment. All together now: "H-e-llo, Ri-ck-y."


In truth, I am wating for arranged marriages to come back into style in the Western hemisphere. And I don't mean being set up on blind dates, or having my email address handed out to perfect strangers by my relatives. No, in a perfect world we would all get married at 25. There would be a church job (a 'calling' in my church) whose sole ministry would be the assignment of eternal companions. Presumably this person would be open to inspiration and revelation in making the assignment, so that it would be more like, "I'm marrying so-and so? Hmmm. Now I see. I never would have found so-and-so on my own. Thank you so much!" etc., etc. How could you divorce someone that God, through his annointed matchmaker, had chosen just for you? It would take a lot of faith, but then again, so does dating.

Friday, April 01, 2005

He can't be serious--can he?

I have never declared myself as belonging to either of the major parties, though I am definitely a republican leaning voter. The Terri Schaivo case has reinforced my disgust with politics in general. I cannot believe how much mileage the republicans are getting out of this, and, since I usually dislike the Democratic rhetoric, I am surprised and admire the silence of the Democratic party on this.

Tom DeLay had this to say:

"Mrs. Schiavo's death is a moral poverty and a legal tragedy. This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change. The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today. Today we grieve, we pray, and we hope to God this fate never befalls another." [reported on CNN]

We hope to God this fate never befalls another? This fate befalls hundreds every single day. Familes are called upon to make the hardest decisions they ever have to make. But wait! If Tom and the president get their way, we won't have to make this decision.

Congress will.

This is a decision to be made by families. When there is an argument, the decision should be mediated by the courts. Not the President. Not his governor brother. Not the Congress. 

To Tom -- Why don't you pay attention to your own ethics. Moral Poverty? Have you ever heard the the phrase "avoid the very appearance of evil?" I don't know about the allegations against you, but perhaps you should pay more attention to them. And avoiding situations which provoke these attacks.

To Bill Frist, who watched a video of Terri Schiavo and declared her diagnosis a mis-diagnosis -- Physician, heal thyself. You are a heart surgeon. Not a neurologist. And your use of the title M.D. is shameful in this context.

To President Bush -- What if it were your wife? Would you have still signed the bill? Would you have then let congress move the decision from you to the federal courts?

To Gov. Bush, who said "
The beginning of life and the end of life, I think, is something we need to learn to do better." -- Just because it sounds cool, doesn't mean the two go together. Your attempts to overrule judicial decisions were --saying it nicely -- very bad government.

To America -- Sign your living will, for all the good it will do, and then move on with life. Our obsession with Terri Schiavo (I should take my own advice since this is my third post about this) is another manifestation of our ugly fascination with celebrity.

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Build a culture of life--

Terri Schiavo isn't even cold yet--and the president is further politicizing an issue of which he should not have been part.

President Bush sent condolences to Schiavo's families. "I urge all those who honor Terri Schiavo to continue to work to build a culture of life where all Americans are welcomed and valued and protected." The president and, obviously, the republican part will be casting this as another front for the fight against abortion.

CNN has asked for comments--asking whether "this case [has] affected [me] personally?"

Terri Schiavo's case should not have touched me personally--it happened thousands of miles away in a place I have only seen from airplanes. What affected me personally was when my family had to make the same decision for my grandmother. I can only imagine how much harder the decision would have been for them if congress had decided to intervene. And why did they not? Was my grandmother worth less that Terri Schiavo? No, Terri schiavo has become politcal carrion. In truth, the President's and Congress' actions are NOT about Terri Schiavo.

Will they be doing this often? Will the next highly publicized child-custody case also be moved to Federal Court? There are thousands of people in the U.S. alone in a persistent vegetative state, awake, but unaware of their surroundings. Hundereds of decisions concerning their care are made every single day. How will Congress pick and choose which decisions should be reviewed in federal courts? Their place is to make Law to govern us all--not just Terri Shciavo.

Tuesday, March 29, 2005

Fielding passes grueling defense examination!

In other news today Ricky Fielding successfully defended his Master's project titled "Satellite based Investigation of Mesospheric Infrared Emissions".

Ricky is reportedly very excited and glad to be one step closer to membership in that oft-elusive group, "The Workforce". He is currently accepting applications from employers, and hopes to make a decision soon.

More at 10.

Thursday, March 24, 2005

Whose family is next on the congressional docket?

An OpEd piece in my school newspaper praised Congress for passing the national version of "Terri's Law," saying that it showed how important the individual is amidst all our talk of programs and initiatives. I wrote this in response--

On Wednesday, Jon Cox wrote that "the most powerful political body in the world took a weekend to pass a bill just for [Terri Schiavo];" that he was "enthralled" by congress' focus on an individual, and that this sort of action shows just how much we care. Mr. Cox is wrong. In the U.S. alone, there are between 15,000 and 35,000 persons being sustained who have been diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state. Why were none of these mentioned in this national version of "Terri's Law?" Where is our concern for them?

There is no overpowering concern in this nation for Terri Schiavo. Terri's guardian, Michael, and her Parents, the Schindlers, are standing in front of a studio audience made up of the entire nation--we watch them call names; we are horrified at allegations of abuse; we blame the judicial system for abandoning Terri; we use bullhorns, pickets, and protests (look at the pictures) to speak out. Where is Jerry Springer when we need him? We are not concerned with Terri's life or death—We are enthralled by a family fight, the likes of which most of us can only imagine. After all, what is more alluring than another family's dirty laundry? Our concern is just another ugly fascination with celebrity.

Hundreds of people every day have to make this decision for a loved one—a decision between death and a life of mechanical breath and liquid food. Congress has made no law for them. The nation knows none of their names. And yet, just for Terri, we watch, we answer opinion polls, we protest, we cry. Where are our tears for the hundreds of tragedies that occur every day? Where is our pain for the dozens in our own communities who face the same circumstance?

What if this were your family or mine? Your Sister? My Mother? How many of us know the agony of that decision? It can only be worse to endure second guessing by an entire nation and its government. None of us beside her family and friends will truly mourn Terri. Of course we will be sad. Of course we will send flowers and TV cameras. But when she dies, which of us will remember how she was before her heart stopped? Which of us will cry to once more feel her touch or see her smile? Life will go on for each of us as it did the day before, absent no one.

I am not here to voice support for Michael Schiavo or the Schindlers'. I am here, however, to defend our system of law. The original court in this case determined in the year 2000 that it would be Terri's wish to have the feeding tube removed. The original court determined, on the basis of credible and distinguished expert testimony, that Terri is "awake but unaware", locked in a persistent vegetative state. Terri's parents appealed the rulings. For five years, court after court has found the original judge's decision to have merit. Indeed, the courts noted that "few, if any, similar cases have ever been afforded this heightened level of process." As congress intervened, they threw centuries of judicial practice out the window. Whose family will be next on the congressional docket?

Terri Schiavo has become the "Terri Schiavo case" and "Terri's Law". Terri Schiavo has become a symbol—a pawn—in a very political fight. Representatives who rightly recognized that Congress had no place in that hospice room will be vilified at their next election as the ones who voted to kill Terri. I am ashamed of our legislators and our president. We should all be ashamed of the circus we have made of a difficult situation. Terri Schiavo is a woman, a daughter, a wife, a patient, a friend. She should never have to be a sound bite in the next election.